We use cookies in this website. Read about them in our privacy policy. To disable them, configure your browser properly. If you keep using this website, you are accepting those.

NK2019 - Post-conference survey

How would you rate the NK2019 overall ?

Excellent

Good

Average

Poor

Very poor

Not sure or N/A

Is it your first NK meeting ?

Yes

Please rate the following items :

	Excellent	Good	Average	Poor	Very poor	Not sure or N/A
Value of the meeting (Science vs Cost to attend)
Abstract submission process
Quality of the scientific sessions
Quality of oral presentations
Relevance of poster session thematics
Quality of posters layout
Set up of poster area
Meeting program in general
NK2019 registration process

Did the meeting allow you to gain new knowledge and expertise ?

Yes

If yes, please identify the most valuable topic

If no, was the conference description, objectives or goals misleading ? If yes how or why ?

Did the educational activity impact your competency ( skills/ abilities/strategies gained from the new information) ?

Yes

If yes, please describe what skills/abilities/strategies you have gained from the information presented

If no, please explain why this activity will not impact you competency :

Will this educational activity impact your performance ( implementing the new skills/ abilities/strategies):

Yes

If yes, please list at leat one skill/ability/strategy you plan to implement in your practice:

If no, please identify the barriers you perceive for implementing these changes (choose all that apply):

Cost

Lack of time to assess/counsel patients

Lack of administrative support/ressources

Insurance/Reimbursment issues

Patient Compliance issues

Lack of consensus or professional guidelines

Other (please specify)

Will the skills/abilities/strategies you've obtained at this conference potentially affect your patients' outcomes ?

Yes

If yes, please describe how those skills/strategies will affect your patients' outcomes:

If no, please explain why the skills/abilities/strategies you've obtained at this conference will not affect your patients' outcomes :

Did you have enough time to visit all the posters and meet all the presenters you were intested in meeting ?

Yes

If no, what would you have made these opportunities better ?

What did you think of the length of the meeting (4 days) ?

Too short

Too long

Just right

Did you have enough time to visit all the posters and meet all the presenters you were interested in meeting ?

Yes

If no, what would have made these opportunities better ?

Please give us your opinion on the meeting venue :

	Excellent	Good	Average	Poor	Very poor	Not sure or N/A
General atmosphere of the Hotel
Hotel location
Conference room amenities
Poster room
Quality of the food
Quantity of food available
Shuttle service

Comments

How did you enjoy the social event ?

Excellent

Good

Average

Poor

Very poor

Not sure or N/A

How did you like the Gala Dinner ?

	Excellent	Good	Average	Poor	Very poor	Not sure / not applicable
Gala dinner in general
Venue of the gala dinner
Catering : quality of walking dinner
Catering : amount of food available for the walking dinner
Catering : service quality (waiters...)
Live band

What changes would you suggest for the future to make the NK Meetings more useful and beneficial for you ?

What topics should be included at the NK2021 in Florida ?

Are you likely to attend the NK2021 in Florida ?

Yes

What factors would influence this decision (check all that apply)?

Programming - topics

Programming - speakers

Attendance of mentors/colleagues

Financial issues

Meeting date

Meeting location